The Best 9/11 Film Yet

9/11 Mysteries:

"90 minutes of pure demolition evidence and analysis, laced with staggering witness testimonials. Moving from 'the myth' through 'the analysis' and into 'the players,' careful deconstruction of the official story set right alongside clean, clear science. The 9/11 picture is not one of politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple physics. How do you get a 10-second 110-story pancake collapse?

A movie that might actually reach our complacent mainstream. No agenda. No finger-pointing. Just the facts and the 'mysteries.' "

Expert reacts to WTC-7 Collapse

The Many Faces of Saeed Sheikh

Paul Thompson, author of Terror Timeline writes:

"If you read just one thing at this website, please read this essay. Don’t mind the length and complexity. Saeed Sheikh’s story is not just mildly interesting.

Understanding the history of this young man may not only explain many mysteries of 9/11, including solid evidence of foreign government involvement in the attacks, but may also reveal if nuclear war in the near future is likely. No kidding. Please read! Note that this was first written in September 2002 but has been thoroughly overhauled based on exposure to additional evidence. " -- Sept. 11's Smoking Gun.

Skeptic: eSkeptic: Monday, September 11th, 2006

Skeptic: eSkeptic: Monday, September 11th, 2006

Science & Technology at Scientific American.com: Fahrenheit 2777 -- 9/11 has generated the mother of all conspiracy theories

Steven Jones

One of the most high-profile scholars, tenured BYU Professor Steven E. Jones, was put on paid leave, while BYU administrators determine what to do about him. He wrote a scholarly paper that demonstrates that thermate charges are what actually brought three (count 'em 3) buildings to free fall to the ground, one after another, within seconds.

The suspension of duties came on the heels of a recently published blatant lie by Jonathon Moseley, executive director of the U.S. Seaports Commission, who wrote a piece in WorldNetDaily: 9/11 Bush bashers: which contained this "Editor's note, Aug. 17, 2006: In paragraph four of this column, the author makes an assertion about professor Steven Jones' remarks at a 9/11 symposium broadcast by C-SPAN. A review of the program online evidenced no such comments by Jones.

Moseley wrote: "When asked if violent revolution was necessary, this scientist declared – in front of national TV cameras – that there is no peaceful way to achieve the group's goals. In the context of the question, professor Jones was calling for the violent overthrow of the government."

It's still there in the article, despite the fact that the Editor found no evidence. Jones' entire presentation on CSPAN can be found at the top link.

A web page devoted to Steven Jones quotes him: "'Things have changed some around here you may have heard, but I’m still working hard!!'"

9/11 Press for Truth: Volunteer

Paul Craig Roberts - "Where is the evidence?":

"How, for example, can it be possible that on one short morning of September 11, 2001, multiple failures occurred not only in airport security but also in FAA and NORAD procedures? The probability of any one of these failures is low. The probability of all of these failures occurring on one morning is very low indeed. How is it possible that essentially all US security failures of the last 5 or 10 years occurred on one morning? What probability do independent statisticians assign to such an event?

The probability is also extremely low that the only three steel columned buildings believed to have collapsed from fire all failed on the same day from three separate fires...'"

Press for Truth

911Blogger.com blog shouts: Attention Chicago! "9/11 Press for Truth" free screening 9/13/2006. The link has an informative review of the film, inspired by the four New Jersey widows whose husbands died in the 9/11 crashes. Their demands resulted in the first 9/11 Commission report, which turned out to be a whitewash. The facts presented in Press for Truth can be found in the definitive 9/11 Timeline.

If no one else does, I'll try arrange a showing of Press for Truth here in Carbondale . . . at the Big Muddy Independent Media Center, or the Student Center, or at one of the houses of worship in the area. Since it's factual (unlike the recent ABC-Disney fictionalized version) a showing in the Civic Center; or at local schools could be arranged.

The producers of 9/11: Press for Truth were on CSPAN yesterday. They want the film to spur a movement for an impartial Investigation into the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.

Regarding another aspect of 9/11, the crumbling of the towers: in a blow to academic freedom, one of the most high-profile scholars, tenured BYU Professor Stephen E. Jones, was put on paid leave, while BYU administrators determine what to do about him. He wrote a scholarly paper that demonstrates that thermite charges are what actually brought the buildings to free fall to the ground in 7 seconds

Press for Truth steers clear of Towers issues, as well as the controversy surrounding the Pentagon strike.

Yesterday, the two creators of another popular 9/11 film: Loose Change debated two representatives of the Popular Mechanics on the Democracy Now! program, available for download. Worth a listen to hear Jason Bermas, researcher for "Loose Change" say to James Meigs, (editor-in-chief of Popular Mechanics, and one of the authors of "Debunking 911 Myths"), "I'm not calling anybody a liar, sir. . . . I'm calling you a liar." The kids were passionate and made their case, once the cell phone argument was dropped. Their case is this: Don't take their word for it. Review the evidence on your own.

In April, 2005, Jim Hoffman answered Popular Mechanics' Assault on 9/11 Truth.

Democracy Now! Debate

Yesterday, the two creators of another popular 9/11 film: Loose Change debated two representatives of the Popular Mechanics on the Democracy Now! program, available for download. Worth a listen to hear Jason Bermas, researcher for "Loose Change" say to James Meigs, (editor-in-chief of Popular Mechanics, and one of the authors of "Debunking 911 Myths"), "I'm not calling anybody a liar, sir. . . . I'm calling you a liar." The kids were passionate, and held their ground, once the cell phone argument was dropped.

If 9-11 was 'an inside job'
They didn't need G. Liddy, or the mob --
Just a bunch of Terrorists who hate us,
Going by the name Al Qaeda.
The hijackers had funds and aid,
To carry out their plan,
As our defense backed off,
Although so many knew it in advance,
Through intelligence from other lands
In the months & days before attack.
The words were loud and clear:
"Bin Laden determined to strike!"
Bush heard, on August 6, in Texas.
Yet he did absolutely nothing, why?
What would he stand to gain
Beyond the horror and the pain?

Our President did not, repeat did not
Conceive or implement the plot
for a "Pearl Harbor-like" event
Referred to in a think-tank document,
(Who did, is a good question)
But Bush did nothing to prevent it,
Since patriotic feelings, and alarm
That enemies would do us harm,
Would boost PR for his first term,
Providing good pretext for war--
Which has its upside, to be sure
(not counting killed & wounded)
A foothold in an oil region
Which was the tactic planned
After surveillance measures in the land
Were introduced and quickly passed.

Now some widowed victims of the 9-11 crashes
Think it's time for evidence to be rehashed,
Since the first Commission white-washed,
Ignored and quashed key facts.

Does a new investigation have a chance?
Will it hurt the nation's image or enhance?

911: Press for Truth

Looked at as a fraction, the truth of 9/11 is .81818181818181818181818181818181818181818181. Fifteen consecutive .81's.

Looked at as a Timeline, it's this link.

There are many, many 9/11 Truth blogs in the blogosphere. This one will keep tabs on the progress of the 9/11 truth movement, which appears to be reaching critical mass these days.