NP? CD? What else ya got?

Summarizing the most concrete 9/11 evidence for mainstream consumption:

Edward35 writes:

"Following is a list of topics which could be considered to have concrete evidence of government involvement in the 9/11 attacks, relying mainly on declassified documents, mainstream media reports, as well as audio and video testimony by key individuals...

- prior examples of government sponsored terrorism
- prior stated intentions related to the attacks
- prior knowledge of the attacks
- blocked investigations before the attacks
- behavior during the attacks
- blocked investigations after the attacks
- disinformation put out about the 9/11 Truth Movement

Edward minimizes the importance of the WTC7 collapse (video above right). Stallion4 comments:

"... [F]ire and structural damage doesn't cause modern steel-framed high-rise buildings to fall straight down 'uniformly' into their footprint at freefall speeds. The only time this has ever been documented to happen before or after 9/11 was from the use of explosives being strategically placed in buildings to bring them down.

Here is some more information regarding Building 7 that you may not be aware of:

We have demolition experts and structural experts on public record confirming that Building 7 was a controlled demolition.

We have witnesses who've stated that the government is lying about the amount of damage to the building's South face.

We have several witnesses who heard 'blast sounds' before and during the building's demolition.

We have audiotape evidence of these 'Blast Sounds' seconds before the building came down.

We have witnesses who were told that the building was going to be 'brought down on purpose' several hours before Building 7 fell (We also have video evidence of Ground Zero workers admitting to this on 9/11 before the building came down).

We have several different angles on videotape that prove the building fell straight down 'uniformly' into its footprint in six seconds.

We have video evidence of explosions occurring during the building's demolition.

We have photographic evidence suggesting that Building 7's steel columns were cut with explosives.

We have the owner of the building admitting on videotape that the building was 'pulled'.

We have controlled demolition experts on audio and videotape confirming that the term 'pull it' is a controlled demolition term.

We have Danny Jowenko, who has nearly twenty years experience working in the field of controlled demolition, on videotape saying that Larry Silverstein's 'pull it' comments meant to bring the building down using explosives.

We have absolute proof that the government covered up the truth about Building 7.

Every individual that I've ever shown Building 7 evidence to in person have always been very interested in it and can't believe they've never heard about it before. Most people in the 9/11 truth movement usually say that the demolition of Building 7 is what convinced them that the government is lying about 9/11.

The mainstream media refuses to talk about Building 7. "